The pronouncement of the guarantor the story. Now known, emerges following a complex investigation promoted. By the national guarantor on the basis of a series of complaints which also involved other european authorities.In recent months, first the austrian guarantor and subsequently. The french guarantor, have intervened. On similar issues with decisions in line with the one in question. In the case in question, the italian authority, following the check. Found that the company concerned (a publisher) had used the google analytics service .
Has In Fact Indicated That The Question Must Be Addressed In The
in its free version for the pursuit of purely statistical purposes or aimed at obtaining aggregate information on the user Brazil Email List activity within its own website “by collecting a series of information, through cookies, regarding the methods of interaction of the interested parties with the websites; among the data collected was also the IP address; such data would then have been transferred to the United States as a result of the setting of the same service offered by the provider; transfer however illegitimate because it does not comply with Regulation 679/2016.
In Reconstructing The Matter The Guarantor Authority
On this occasion, the guarantor specified. How the ip address constitutes personal data (even if it is not. Transferred in full but is partially truncated) signaling that the association of this. Data with other information is potentially capable of re-identify an interested party. In particular in the case of services provided by providers. Already in ch leads CH Leads possession of other personal information of the individual user (for example. Account data). Furthermore, considering. The fact that many services on the web are provided by providers. Based in the united states and that the functioning of these services presupposes. The transfer of the data being processed to the united states, the data controller is required.