Light of the judgment of the court of justice of july 2020. With which the court annulled the adequacy decision (privacy shield).Which regulated the transfer of data between the european union and the united states. The guarantor then ordered the company to proceed. With an adequate assessment of the measures adopted, deeming that. Those applied were not suitable to guarantee the level of protection. Required by the gdpr with consequent suspension of the use of the service until compliance is restored. Checks to be carried out within ninety days of the publication of the provision.
Since At The Outcome Of The Investigation This Degree
Finally, considering that the present case, the type of activity implemented, is potentially applicable to many other realities, to avoid Brunei Email List asymmetries, the authority has urged all website managers to verify the methods of using web services, from google analytics to other similar services based on the use of cookies and other tracking tools, since they could run into the same problems. In a nutshell, the central point of the question is therefore not (only) the use of certain tools but the transfer of data that the use of certain tools may involve.
Of Protection Had Not Been Considered In Line With The European One
Data transfer between the european union and the united states. The problems relating to the cross-border data transfer emerge. Following the judgment of the european court of justice (cjeu) of 16 july 2020. (known as “Schrems ii”) with which it CH Leads established. The illegitimacy of the equivalence attributed by the european commission. To the us legal system with the adequacy decision. Called “Privacy shield” 2 . The cjeu argued by stating that the level of protection guaranteed. In the territory of the european union must accompany.Data wherever they are transferred, both during the transfer phase and in the country of destination. Degree of protection not necessarily identical but substantially “Equivalent” to that applied in the european union.
